First round review by topic editor

Web16. 7. 53. 87. Duration first review round is the time between submission of a manuscript and the moment the editor informs the author (s) about the outcome of the first peer review round. More information: Huisman & Smits, 2024. ‘Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective’, Scientometrics, 113 (1), pp. 633-650. WebApr 6, 2024 · 89 episodes. Welcome to In Depth, a new podcast from First Round Review that’s dedicated to surfacing the tactical advice founders and startup leaders need …

publications - Do two rounds of major revision lead to a better …

WebThe review process should be timely and fair. Editors should assign reviewers immediately after receiving a new paper, and send personal emails to overdue reviewers (the … WebAnswer: You alluded to the answer in your question. The First Round Blog is our place on the web to share information and announcements about First Round and our … can mitchen cabinets go iver lvp flooring https://cansysteme.com

Better Meetings Make for Better Days - First Round Review

WebRevise and Resubmit is used when an article needs major revisions but it is not clear yet whether those revisions will be able to be made as part of a first round review and … WebApr 6, 2024 · Pending review = The paper is due to be pre-checked. Under review = The paper is being peer-reviewed. Pending decision = A first assessment will be made by … WebJan 5, 2024 · Meaning of Decision in Process after Required Reviews Completed in the first round of peer review ... Topics under this stage ... So, a change to Decision in Process after the peer review means the Associate/Managing Editor (AE/ME) has looked at the reviewers’ comments, made their decision on the paper based on those comments, … fixer upper shiplap bathroom

Best Practices: Guidelines for Editors and Associate Editors

Category:In the first round of review, we received the following decision. If we

Tags:First round review by topic editor

First round review by topic editor

Best Practices: Guidelines for Editors and Associate Editors

WebNov 8, 2015 · In my opinion, first round decides whether the quality and technicality of the paper is considerable or not. If yes, then reviewer provides his/her minor and major comments. In second round of review, first reviewer checks whether all his/her comments have been addressed or not. Is the paper now seems reason to accept? WebFeb 17, 2024 · One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well.

First round review by topic editor

Did you know?

Web10 hours ago · The Collierville Design Review Commission met April 13. (Abigail Warren/The Daily Memphian) Walmart may be able to get away with the blue of its brand. Commissioners also reviewed a subdivision and one businesses who wants an alternative to awnings. Abigail Warren is a lifelong resident of Shelby ... WebApr 14, 2024 · By Staff report • April 14, 2024 1:30 am. Courtesy of Suquamish Clearwater Casino Resort. Football fans are getting excited for the NFL Draft April 27 as the Seahawks have two first-round picks. As part of the excitement, Seahawks linebacker Darrell Taylor is hosting his 2nd Annual Pro Football Draft Party at the Suquamish Clearwater Casino ...

WebApr 9, 2024 · Possible outcomes of peer review. The journal’s editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and uses this information to … WebMay 28, 2024 · The editor’s actions. Typically, the editor calls in new reviewers for a revised/reviewed manuscript when there’s a disagreement between/among the existing peer reviewers. As there was no disagreement, the editor’s decision is a bit surprising. In that case, there may be a conflict between the editor and the reviewers or perhaps even ...

WebApr 6, 2024 · Under review = The paper is being peer-reviewed. Pending decision = A first assessment will be made by the Academic Editor. It usually takes around 48 hours. Pending major or minor revisions = Author revisions are in progress. Pending editor decision = The Academic Editor is making a final decision. WebJun 8, 2024 · We spoke with First Round Review’s editor, Jessi Craige Shikman, about how she structures a lean team, how it consistently generates high-quality content ideas, …

WebDec 6, 2024 · Camille Ricketts is managing editor at First Round Review. I asked for her advice on how to build a much-loved online magazine …

WebAnswer (1 of 16): In my field, it is common for the first round of review to take about 3 months and an editor is not likely to take seriously a request to hurry the process before that. Everyone needs their papers published quickly — for graduate school applications, for job applications, for an... can mites have sexWebIt is rare for manuscripts to be recommended “as is” in the first round of review. If the Editor does not agree with the AE’s recommendation, the Editor may return the … fixer upper shotgun house episode huluWebSep 18, 2015 · The first round of revision was very fast; it took less than 10 days. One of two referees suggested a minor revision while the other asked for a moderate amount of … fixer upper show homes for saleWebWebflow’s Path to Product-Market Fit — Lessons on Creating a Market with Rigorous Customer Empathy. Webflow’s Bryant Chou tells the story of how he and his co-founders leaned into the power of customer empathy to create the leading visual development platform for building powerful websites without writing code. The Secret to an In Sync ... can miter saw be used as table sawWebWhen a journal first receives your submission, there are typically two separate checks to confirm that the paper is appropriate and ready for peer review: Technical check. Performed by a technical editor to ensure that … can mites from a pet bird bite peopleWebJan 8, 2014 · First, we would like to say thank you to the reviewers for the useful comments to improve the paper. We have addressed all the comments as explained below. REVIEWER 1. “Section 3 is too long”. We have addressed this comment by deleting a few lines at the end of the second paragraph that were not necessary for understanding the … fixer upper shower curtainWebDec 28, 2015 · Popular answers (1) In my experience you can challenge an editor’s decision when the review is clearly biased. When challenging the decision you may … can mites live in internal organs