WebDec 22, 2015 · See, e.g., Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[B]ecause [the petitioner] did not raise [certain arguments] in his opening brief, we deem those issues waived.”); Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding that arguments not raised in a party’s opening brief generally are waived). WebBhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Id. To reverse a credibility determination in particular, “we must find …
Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083 Casetext Search + Citator
WebRizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011), overruled in part on other grounds by Alam, 11 F. 4th 1133. If the noncitizen offers an explanation that is “reasonable and plausible,” the IJ has to provide a “specific and cogent reason for rejecting” the explanation. WebApr 28, 2024 · Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039–40 (9th Cir. 2010). In general, adverse credibility findings “are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)). We review de novo questions of law. Bhattarai v. black-owned whiskey tennessee
ZHOU QIN HAUNG v. BARR (2024) FindLaw
WebBhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Id. To reverse a credibility determination in particular, “we must find that the evidence not only supports [a contrary] conclusion, but compels it.” Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (alteration in original ... On appeal, Attia argues that the BIA failed to address her challenge to the IJ's adverse credibility determination regarding her testimony. We agree. The BIA's opinion states: "The respondents consist of a married couple and their two children. For purposes of this order, reference to `the respondent' will refer to the lead male … See more Rizk claims that the IJ's adverse credibility determination was not supported by substantial evidence. Where, as here, the BIA expressly adopts the IJ's decision, we … See more Applying these principles, we begin by considering whether the factual discrepancies in Rizk's testimony constitute substantial evidence supporting the IJ's … See more WebSep 23, 2024 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)). In this case, the credible fear interview does not undermine the agency’s decision to deny relief. The IJ may base an adverse credibility finding on discrepancies that do not go “to the heart” of the asylum claim, so long as those inconsistencies are … black owned whole life insurance companies